Marine and Coastal Science: U.S. Ocean Policy Report Card

If the U.S. government were a student, it would be on the verge of flunking Ocean Policy 101, to judge by the U.S. Ocean Policy Report Card issued 3 February 2006 by the Joint Ocean Commission Initiative. The United States has accomplished far too little in response to a health crisis in the nation’s oceans, coasts, and Great Lakes, according to the report card. More than a dozen federal agencies have a say in setting and implementing ocean policy, and they often fail to work together. Policy makers need to repair this fragmented system of ocean governance, and they need to do it fast. 
 
The 10-member initiative was created to track government response to two landmark ocean commissions. In September 2004, the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy, a presidential panel chaired by retired admiral James Watkins, recommended that Congress boost ocean research funding, improve fisheries management, and consolidate federal oversight over ocean policy. A year earlier, the privately funded Pew Oceans Commission, chaired by Clinton White House chief of staff Leon Panetta, had reached many of the same conclusions. 
 
Yet policy makers have done too little to fix the nation’s confusing system of authority over coastal and marine ecosystems, says initiative member Andrew Rosenberg, a fisheries scientist at the University of New Hampshire. “A lot of the issues that the commissions talked about came true with Hurricane Katrina: wetlands loss, lack of planning, inadequate infrastructure, risk from natural hazards, continued fragmentation of ocean policy, major damage to fisheries in the [Gulf of Mexico],” he says. “We need a lead ocean agency to take a new direction internally and to cooperate with other agencies to consolidate and focus programs.” 
 
Initially, government leaders responded positively to the two commission reports, a response that earned an A– on the report card. In December 2004, Bush released an action plan that included the creation of a committee to oversee ocean policies (this committee will release a priorities plan and implementation strategy at the end of 2006). Congress and state governors also acknowledged the major recommendations of both commissions. 
 
But momentum has stalled since then. Congress and the Bush administration have not done enough to create a national ocean policy and to strengthen NOAA to the point that it can serve as the lead ocean agency, according to the report card, which gives leaders a D+ in the category of national ocean governance reform. 
 
Policy makers, moreover, receive an F in new funding for ocean policy and programs. The U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy called for a doubling over five years of ocean-related research funding. But federal ocean research received level funding in fiscal year 2006, and Bush’s 2007 budget proposal would reduce NOAA’s oceanic and atmospheric research support by 9%, to $338 million. Important ocean programs such as the six NOAA Undersea Research Centers were severely cut for 2006 and would not be fully restored under the 2007 budget. 
 
“We are very disappointed in the president’s budget request for NOAA,” says Ted Morton, federal policy director of the international nonprofit Oceana. “We were expecting to see more increases for critical ocean and coastal programs. The commissions were clear that significant increases were necessary to restore ocean health.” 
 
The report card gives government a C+ for fisheries management reform, noting the Senate’s establishment of bipartisan support in an effort to reauthorize the 1976 Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act, the primary federal law governing fisheries management. 
 
Another bright spot is the ongoing reform of ocean management occurring in some states and regions. Among the most notable are efforts in California, Puget Sound, and the Gulf of Maine. These management efforts, which earned a B–, are using a broad ecosystem approach and include government at all levels. The idea is to work toward regional cooperation and across jurisdictional lines in new and existing programs. In the Pacific Northwest, for example, the Northwest Straits Commission addresses marine conservation in the region, the Shared Strategy for Puget Sound addresses salmon recovery in that water body, and the Puget Sound/Georgia Basin International Task Force addresses environmental problems associated with population growth.


INTRODUCTION
Ifosfamide is an alkylating oxazaphosphorine active against a number of malignancies including bone and soft tissue sarcomas as a single agent [1,2] or in combination [3].The development of mesna in 1979 largely ameliorated haemorrhagic cystitis as a complication of its use [4,5] and the principal associated toxicities became myelosuppression, neurotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity; including glomerular, proximal, and distal tubular dysfunction [6,7].If severe, proximal tubular dysfunction may lead to Fanconi syndrome; characterised by glycosuria, aminoaciduria, and excess urinary excretion of phosphate, calcium, bicarbonate, potassium, sodium, and magnesium [8].Left untreated, hypophosphatemia results in skeletal abnormalities: rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults [8].While the renal and skeletal consequences of ifosfamide have been well described in the paediatric population [6,7], there is limited information on such effects in adults.
Here, we report three adult patients in whom osteomalacia as a late consequence of ifosfamide-induced renal tubular dysfunction mimicked skeletal metastases.These cases were diagnosed over a three-year period at a regional cancer centre in which approximately 30-40 patients per year receive ifosfamide-based chemotherapy for sarcoma.In each case osteomalacia was diagnosed on the basis of radiological findings in combination with serum biochemical abnormalities.We define Fanconi syndrome as an acquired renal tubular defect resulting in excess loss of glucose, bicarbonate, amino acids, uric acid, and phosphate.All patients described gave informed consent for publication.

METHODS
Literature review was performed by searches of PubMed using the terms "osteomalacia," "nephrotoxicity," "Fanconi syndrome," "ifosfamide," and "chemotherapy" for articles Sarcoma published between 1970 and 2006.Additional papers were identified from the references of relevant articles.

Case 1
A 25-year-old man was referred to our institution with an undifferentiated high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the right thigh in March 1998.He had no history of renal disease and serum electrolytes and creatinine 91 µmol/L were normal at presentation.He received neoadjuvant chemotherapy as described in Table 1 (Case 1, Regimen 1), without complication and with normal serum biochemistry throughout.The tumour responded to treatment and the patient proceeded to radiotherapy (kidneys not included in treatment field) and surgery.
In January 2000, lung metastases were detected in followup imaging and subsequently resected.No further systemic therapy was given.However, in August 2000 unresectable disease progression necessitated palliative chemotherapy (Table 1, Regimen 2).Biochemistry remained within normal range during treatment, and a partial response with effective palliation was achieved.
In June 2001, the patient developed further symptomatic progression of disease.Serum creatinine measured 123 µmol/L, corresponding to a calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 80ml/min according to the method of Cockroft and Gault [9].Further chemotherapy was given (Table 1), but discontinued after 4 cycles due to lack of response.In view of the limited treatment options available and their previous efficacy, single-agent ifosfamide was used (Table 1).The patient required hospitalization after the first cycle for management of febrile neutropenia with antibiotics including gentamicin (4 doses at 4 mg/kg daily dose).During this admission transient hypokalemia (nadir 2.6 mmol/L) and elevation of serum creatinine (maximum 134 µmol/L) were observed.Both normalised with supplementation and rehydration and remained within normal range during subsequent courses.Treatment resulted in significant tumour regression and effective palliation.
In April 2002, five months after cessation of ifosfamide treatment, concomitant with further progression of pulmonary disease, the patient complained of bilateral ankle pain following a snowboarding holiday.Isotope bone scan demonstrated increased uptake at sites of symptoms and serum alkaline phosphatase measured 266 IU/L.Though the possibility of skeletal metastases was considered, careful review of plain radiographs revealed insufficiency fractures of both ankles, confirmed on magnetic resonance (MR) scan (Figure 1).Biochemistry confirmed the characteristic hypokalaemia and hypophosphataemia (0.8 mmol/L) of renal Fanconi syndrome.There was no urinary sediment and serum whole parathyroid hormone (PTH) was normal.Oral alfacalcidol and potassium supplementation were prescribed.
Unfortunately, over the following months a steady decline in glomerular function developed with haemodialysis initiated in February 2003.During this period, continued disease progression occurred and despite treatment with two

Case 2
A 33-year-old woman with Ewing's sarcoma of the left tibia was referred for management in May 2002.She had no history of renal disease, and serum creatinine at presentation measured 98 µmol/L.Initial isotope bone scan is shown in Figure 2(a).
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered, using the VIDE regimen [10] (Table 1).After the fifth cycle, the patient was hospitalised for management of febrile neutropenia, including 6 doses of gentamicin at 4 mg/kg daily dose (levels within normal range throughout).During this admission transient hypokalemia (nadir 3.1 mmol/L) and modest elevation of serum creatinine 115 µmmol/L occurred, though both normalised with supplementation and rehydration.In view of this toxicity, the sixth cycle was prescribed at reduced dose, but further hypokalaemia (nadir 2.7 mmol/L) necessitated transient oral supplementation.After completion of chemotherapy, the patient underwent tumour excision with a free fibula graft.
Following surgery, adjuvant therapy was commenced in December 2002 as per standard practice in our institution.One cycle of VAI [10] (Table 1) was given, but complicated by febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization for treatment including 3 doses of gentamicin at 4 mg/kg.During this admission an asymptomatic rise in creatinine to 167 µmol/L occurred.Cyclophosphamide was therefore substituted for ifosfamide for subsequent courses, which were well tolerated with biochemistry remaining within normal range throughout.
Six months after completion of therapy and 10 months after surgery, the patient still complained of significant pain at the operation site.Plain radiographs demonstrated nonunion of the fibula graft but also areas of lucency in the proximal and distal tibia are demonstrated.Isotope bone scan added to suspicion of metastases, with several areas of increased uptake evident (Figure 2(b)).MR performed to further delineate the abnormality revealed a stress fracture within the fibula graft, and biopsies confirmed healing tissue only with no evidence of malignancy.Serum biochemistry demonstrated hypokalaemia and elevated alkaline phosphatase, confirming the diagnosis of osteomalacia secondary to Fanconi syndrome.No urinary sediment was identified, serum whole PTH was normal throughout.Oral alfacalcidol supplementation was commenced.
As of May 2006, the patient is clinically well under joint oncology and nephrology followup with no evidence of recurrent malignancy.She continues to require vitamin D supplementation and serum creatinine remains elevated, but stable at 133 µmol/L.

Case 3
A 31-year-old man was referred in May 2004 for further management of a peripheral neuroectodermal tumour of the left kidney, having undergone left nephrectomy the preced-ing month.He had no history of renal disease and serum creatinine at presentation measured 81 µmol/L.
Staging investigations demonstrated no evidence of metastases and he therefore received adjuvant therapy using the VIDE regimen [10] (Table 1).Following the second cycle of treatment, the patient required hospitalization for management of nausea and vomiting.Significant biochemical derangement was noted on admission; serum creatinine measured 224 µmol/L; urea 11.1 mmol/L; potassium 2.9 mmol/L; phosphate <0.3 mmol/L, and corrected calcium 2.06 mmol/L.Electrolytes normalised with supplementation and serum creatinine fell to 129 µmol/L prior to cycle 3, for which a reduced dose of ifosfamide was used.Despite this, the patient again required hospital admission for management of febrile neutropenia after the two subsequent cycles, on both occasions treated without aminoglycosides.Although serum potassium remained within normal range during this period without supplementation, following the fourth and final cycle marked hypophosphatemia (nadir <0.3 mmol/L) and elevation of serum creatinine 162 µmol/L were noted.Treatment was completed in September 2004.
During initial followup serum creatinine remained elevated but stable at 143-157 µmol/L and the patient was able to discontinue all electrolyte supplementations.However in November 2004 a progressive decline in glomerular function became evident, with increase in creatinine to 300 µmol/L.To exclude obstructive uropathy secondary to retroperitoneal tumour recurrence as cause of this, a CT of the abdomen and pelvis was performed.While this demonstrated no evidence of outflow obstruction, it revealed a number of abnormal areas throughout the skeleton.A bone scan to further assess these showed increased uptake in the region of the left ankle.Further biochemical analysis confirmed elevated alkaline phosphatase, hypocalcaemia, and hypophosphataemia; consistent with osteomalacia secondary to Fanconi syndrome.Whole PTH was normal with no urinary sediment.Oral alfacalcidol supplementation was commenced.
Unfortunately, glomerular function continued to decline over subsequent months, renal biopsy revealed marked interstitial fibrosis, with dialysis initiated in August 2005.At time of this report (May 2006), the patient is free from recurrence, under joint oncology and nephrology followup.

DISCUSSION
The three cases presented illustrate the potential for the delayed development of osteomalacia secondary to ifosfamideinduced Fanconi syndrome in adult patients.Cumulative drug doses were variable; 110 g/m 2 , 57 g/m 2 , and 24 g/m 2 in Cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively.In addition to tubular dysfunction, each patient has shown evidence of associated deranged glomerular filtration, with two patients requiring dialysis.
It is important to note that whilst tubular damage secondary to ifosfamide may become apparent during therapy, it can develop months or even years after cessation of treatment [33,34] as in these cases.The subsequent natural history is equally unpredictable; though damage may resolve with time [6,33], with spontaneous resolution of secondary rickets [35], there may be no improvement in tubular function [34] and an associated progressive decline in GFR can occur [23,36].End-stage renal failure in adults secondary to ifosfamide has previously been documented in three patients after cumulative ifosfamide doses of 56 g/m 2 , 80 g/m 2 and 33 g/m 2 [15].All of these patients had been pretreated with cisplatin, whereas only one of the cases we report had previously received this agent.
Hypophosphatemic rickets occurs in 5-18% [17,23,24] of children treated with ifosfamide and may be the first manifestation of the underlying renal abnormalities [23,24].There are only four published cases of adults with Fanconi syndrome and renal osteomalacia secondary to ifosfamide [37][38][39][40].In three of these, patients have displayed associated symptoms of significant renal dysfunction such as polyuria and polydipsia.By contrast, our patients were clinically well at the time of diagnosis of stress fractures, leading to the suspicion of bone metastases.
Our experience highlights the fact that tubular and skeletal complications of ifosfamide are not restricted exclusively to a high-risk paediatric population.Indeed our second case occurred in a patient without any risk factors receiving standard drug doses.These findings clearly have implications for patient monitoring during and after ifosfamide chemotherapy.Whilst a comprehensive assessment of kidney function as described in the paediatric literature [41] may not be appropriate for all adult patients, assessment of GFR by 51 Cr-EDTA clearance [42] and tubular function by serum and urine electrolyte measurements (including calculation of the renal tubular threshold for phosphate) [41] is straightforward and may help prevent the complications we describe.Unfortunately, the paucity of data on this subject in adults means that when faced with subtle changes in tubular function, clinicians may not have the evidence available upon which to base decisions as how to adjust ifosfamide doses.
These cases demonstrate the need for clinicians to be vigilant for signs of renal tubular dysfunction in patients receiving ifosfamide, particularly if cisplatin is pretreated, as timely intervention may prevent skeletal complications of this drug.They also illustrate the point that when faced with a patient in the clinic with bone pain and abnormal isotope bone scan after ifosfamide treatment, oncologists should be mindful that the cause may in fact be insufficiency fractures secondary to osteomalacia rather than metastatic disease, and futher skeletal imaging may be required to differentiate between the two.This clinical caveat may be of increasing relevance, as a recent study has documented hypophosphataemia and abnormal bone metabolism in patients treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib, likely through inhibition of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor [43].

Figure 2 :
Figure 2: Case 2: isotope bone scans, (a) at diagnosis, demonstrating increased uptake at site of primary tumor in left tibia, (b) after ifosfamide therapy and surgery, demonstrating continued increased uptake at site of primary tumor and new abnormality in region of right ankle.